squeegy76's blog, page 1

Last login: 3 days agoSqueegy76: squeegy76 is a woman from San Francisco, California, USA.; Likes 2,339 pages, 129 videos, 74 photos • 81 fans • Received 15 reviews; Member since Jun 10, 2006

Favorites » Her Blog

Shakesville: Clinton and Murray: "Hell No.": Jul 17, 10:25pm 2 reviews politics
http://shakespearessister.blogspot.com/2008/07/clinton-and-murray-hell-no.htm...; The wrong candidate was forced out.

Commentary: Best woman for the job could be a man - CNN.com: Jun 29, 5:33pm 1 review
http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/06/06/walker/index.html; Reverse Sexism: There's no such thing.
BTW, There's no racism against white people, either.

http://www.ebogjonson.com/mt-static/images/blackface.jpg: Jun 29, 2:00pm 1 review african-americans
http://www.ebogjonson.com/mt-static/images/blackface.jpg; Seriously? No one's discovered this until now?

Cindy Sheehan For Congress&:&Index: Jun 25, 7:24pm 7 reviews politics
http://www.cindyforcongress.org/; Hell yes!

Dobson accuses Obama of distorting Bible - Yahoo! News: Jun 23, 10:46pm 3 reviews conservative-politics
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080624/ap_on_el_pr/rel_dobson_obama; From the page: ""Even if we did have only Christians in our midst, if we expelled every non-Christian from the United States of America, whose Christianity would we teach in the schools?" Obama said. "Would we go with James Dobson's or Al Sharpton's?" referring to the civil rights leader.

Dobson took aim at examples Obama cited in asking which Biblical passages should guide public policy - chapters like Leviticus, which Obama said suggests slavery is OK and eating shellfish is an abomination, or Jesus' Sermon on the Mount, "a passage that is so radical that it's doubtful that our own Defense Department would survive its application.""

Holy carp! I just got a little warm-fuzzy for Obama, finally! Keep it up.

Shakesville: Not quite getting it.: Jun 22, 12:26pm 1 review politics
http://shakespearessister.blogspot.com/2008/06/not-quite-getting-it.html; From the page: "Here's what he's not getting: the women who are angry about the way that Clinton was treated during the campaign, and about Obama's silence -- what one British writer aptly termed the "malign acceptance" of misogyny -- are not under any illusions that John McCain is better on women's issues than Obama would be. The relative positions of the parties is beside the point. What they don't want to hear is what Obama's saying here: I don't have to deal with your silly issues, which I don't consider to be important or central, because where else are you going to go?

I've been paying attention to the people who are fed up with that line, and I can say one thing: that's just not going to work anymore."

Hullabaloo: Jun 21, 6:07am 1 review liberties
http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2008/06/no-hope-today-by-dday-we-live-in.html; From the page: "I thought [Obama would] issue some vague statement of disapproval and then miss the vote. This endorsement of a X'ing out the Fourth Amendment is waaaay out of bounds."